Electrolysis and Laser Hair Removal Difference

What is the Difference Between Electrolysis and Laser Hair Removal?

We are often asked about the difference between electrolysis and laser hair removal.  New York City is chock full of providers who claim that electrolysis is better than laser hair removal.  Here are a few facts so you can decide for yourself.

Electrolysis is an invasive way to perform hair removal. It involves sticking a needle into the skin and literally electrocuting the area in hopes of destroying a single hair follicle. It is meant for white hair that cannot be removed any other way and is not designed to be used on large skin surfaces.  Electrolysis is also not supposed to be performed on a regular basis due to the damage and marks it leaves on the skin.  In fact, those who choose electrolysis vs. laser hair removal must wait long periods (up to nine months depending on age) in between sessions to allow the skin to heal.

Laser hair removal, on the otherhand, is not only effective for hair removal, but it has other positive benefits, including skin rejuvenation and collagen boost.  In fact, we have clients who come to us specifically for those purposes.

When comparing electrolysis to laser hair removal, think about a bicycle vs. a car.  Electrolysis is an older technology that is not considered an alternative to laser hair removal.  On the contrary, laser is faster, more efficient and is actually meant to replace electrolysis.

If you need a reliable, replicable laser hair removal provider in New York City, look no further. When it comes to laser hair removal, NYC residents trust us to provide them with honest, transparent and quality services.  Give Manhattan Laser Centers a call today!